Thursday, 16 February 2023

100 Years of Irish Brewing in 50 Objects: #2 – Guinness’s Brewery Guide Book (1914)

There is a constant stream of visitors passing through the brewery. A special office and staff is set aside for their reception. They come in from the street, and hand over their permit to a clerk, who in return for it supplies them with an illustrated guide book to the works, containing at the end a packet of half a dozen beautifully finished post cards of various parts of the works.

A visitor to the Guinness brewery reporting in The Kirkintilloch Herald - 19th August 1914

The Guinness Storehouse and the attractions contained within have been consistently topping the most visited places in Ireland for many years, and regardless of what people think of its history, heritage and beer there is no doubt that it has been a huge success from a tourism standpoint, enticing many a visitor to these shores and to the city of Dublin since it opened in 2000, replacing the older visitor’s centre in the Guinness Hop Store. According to Guinness’s own marketing, at The Storehouse you will ‘experience the history, heart, and soul of Ireland’s most iconic beer’ by means of multiple floors filled with all thing Guinness and Guinness related.

Visiting the famous St. James’s Street Brewery is not a new phenomenon and dates back quite far, as there were visitors getting a look inside those famous gates, and right into the brewery itself, well over a century ago at the very least. The guidebook shown here dates from 1914, the very year of the above quotation and sounds extremely like the one described in it, although sadly this one is missing the six postcards and the envelope from the back. The well-worn embossed cover with its wonderfully scrolled decoration and even the text itself evokes that era just at the start of the Art Nouveau period and this design appears to have been in use until a more durable and substantial hardbacked guidebook was introduced in the 1920s. There were earlier versions too such as one form 1897 titles “A Visit to St. James’s Gate Brewery Dublin” published by the London Stereoscopic and Photographic Company in England mentioned in the Dublin Daily Express in August 1897 and an earlier one with the same title in the National Library of Ireland dated 1889 printed by Wilson, Hartnell & Co. of Dublin - incidentally, a company which is still operating today under a somewhat different if related guise.

The 1914 publication was printed by James Walker Ltd. from Rathmines, Dublin who claimed to be ‘Printers to the Brewery’ according to the end page of the booklet. The small volume features a brief history of the brewery as well as a description of what the visitor will see as they journey through the works. The brewing process is described in reasonable detail within its 16 printed pages of text as the visitor is taken through the newer of the two breweries on the site. Interestingly that journey included a visit to the then new fermenting house which was built in 1907, this is the building that currently houses the modern visitor’s centre with the Gravity Bar where people can try the beer perched on top. That 1914 tour also ended with some beer sampling, with four types being offered – ‘”Foreign” Stout for export to foreign countries; “Export” Stout for special trade; ordinary Double Stout, generally called Extra Stout; and Single Stout generally called Porter.’ Some facts are listed in the back of the booklet too, including that the brewery covers 50 acres; uses 180,000 acres of barley and 8,000 acres of hops; they were selling close to 100 million gallons of beer a year; the amount of duty paid by the company in 1913 was £1,368,355, which was almost triple what the next largest brewer on these islands paid; staff numbered 3,650; and the number of bottle labels issued daily put end to end would reach from Dublin to the Isle of man, and the total quantity issued in 1913 would stretch 26,000 miles, ‘or more than round the world.’

The descriptions and facts in the guide book had been written, assessed and vetted by Guinness and although they give quite a lot of interesting detail, it perhaps lack some of the more entertaining descriptions and interesting nuggets of information we might crave. For that we must turn to the words written by those who went on these tours and then wrote about them in newspapers and in other publications.

The Journal of the British Dental Association, Volume 9 published in 1888 does not at first glance seem to be somewhere to find a poetic and dramatic recount of a visit to the brewery but it contains a wonderful report of a visit to the Guinness site by someone who signs themselves ‘Stout and Mild’ regarding an excursion by the association to the James’s Gate Brewery in August of that year. It is peppered with the flowery prose that was quite common at this time.

“In companies of twenty the members of the Association, and their friends of both sexes, were led off by courteous guides holding high office in the establishment and were initiated into all its mysteries. Mysteries there were, sufficient even to satisfy a modern romance writer. Indeed, the wanderings of Rider Haggard's mysterious ‘She,’ in the bowels of her rocky African fortress, or of Virgil and Dante's in the infernal regions, sink into comparative insignificance when compared with the wanderings of the British Dental Association through this weird region of booming machines, steaming cauldrons, colossal mash tubs and frothing seas of darksome liquid.

Forward went the little companies, soon falling apart, by foaming torrents of sweet-wort dashing side by side with cooling streams, on either side endless plains of germinating grain. High above head advance parties could be seen threading their way across narrow bridges and looking small at the dizzy height, like roped gangs of mountaineers when viewed through telescopes from some Alpine valley. Onward still now peering through the Stygian darkness of unfathomable reservoirs filled with the fermenting liquor, whose heavy froth could dimly be seen rising and falling in sullen gloom as it emitted its deadly gaseous poison. On again now letting the eyes wander at leisure over veritable oceans of tranquil stout, calmly awaiting the right moment for ‘cooling down.’”

It would be quite difficult to find a more remarkable description of a tour of any brewery, and the writer continues …

“At this point the Association reassembled, and a dainty little railway train awaited. All being seated, the diminutive engine started off at a merry pace, but soon however entered a darksome tunnel which led by a spiral descent to a part of the establishment, on the level of the Liffey, where a new world opened up. Here the barrelling process held sway. Barrels in thousands were everywhere. Barrels were being made, mended and filled the stout being conducted in pipes from the storage vats. Little railways, both broad and narrow gauge, intersected in all directions. It was amusing to see the way in which the narrow gauge engines were made serviceable on the broader gauge when necessary. These little creatures were lifted bodily into the air by a sort of crane, where they snorted with evident delight at the prospect of their promotion, and were then let down into trucks on the broad gauge line, whose wheels by an ingenious arrangement they were able to keep in motion. 

But one thing remained, and that was to taste the result of all this outcome of human ingenuity, skill and enterprise. The Association tasted and pronounced the result excellent.”

It is fascinating to hear amongst all of that flamboyant description how the narrow gauge engines were used on the larger gauge system – not to mention that wonderfully imagined thought of a ‘snort’ of delight that they gave at the knowledge of moving up in size!

Another professional group, The Society of Chemical Industry also reported on a visit to the brewery in 1891, which was published in The Pharmaceutical Journal and Transactions in 1892, and although quite matter-of-fact compared to the above piece it relays some interesting ‘facts’ - although we must be quite wary of anything reported by visitors.

“About one tenth of the whole is roasted malt, giving the beer its characteristic colour and flavour, the rest being the ordinary dried variety Irish, Algerian and Tunisian barley are all used.”

So our writer is reporting that at this time 10% of the grains used in the brewery were roasted malt, and that some of the pale malt, or most likely the barley used to make the malt, was North African in origin. That same Algerian and Tunisian barley is mentioned as being used by Power & Son’s distillery, a place they visited before heading to Guinness’s. Indeed, a messenger had to be sent from the Guinness brewery to Power’s to find out where the visitors might be as it was feared they might have gone astray!

The writer continues the tour into the fermentation area.

"The requirements of the work [in cooling the fermenters] however made another machine necessary, and one with liquid carbon dioxide was put in. In order supply this it was suggested that the carbon dioxide given off during fermentation should be collected and compressed. This was done and the surplus sold other users of freezing machines worked by liquid CO2."

It appears from this report that Guinness were harvesting and reusing the carbon dioxide that was a by-product of brewing in their cooling systems, and were also selling it elsewhere at a price reported to be 4d per lb. and in bottles containing 25 lbs. each. This is certainly an ingenious and profitable way of making money from something that is essentially a waste product, and is something that is still being done by breweries to this day.

The report of the tour contained more information too, such as how the casks were cleaned in an ingenious way …

"The cask is placed in a cradle, is partly filled with hot water and closed by a bung to which a spiked iron chain is attached inside. The frame communicates a tumbling motion to the cask and at the same time rotates it about its major axis, so that the washing action of the water and the scraping action of the chain take place at every part of its interior."

The writer also goes on to mention how the rims of the casks are colour coded depending on what they contain, single stout (porter) being white, double stout the familiar red, and the export yellow. (Something that was reported by Alfred Barnard on his visit to the brewery for his books on the breweries of these islands around this time too, and Alfred goes into much more detail on the brewery, buildings, process and other details than any other author at this time.)

Our starting quote referenced a visit by an unknown writer in a newspaper to the brewery in 1914, the date of our guide book. The title of the piece was 'A Political Pilgrimage to Ireland – Visit to Guinness’ Brewery and in the article the writer impresses upon the reader just how ubiquitous Guinness is in the city of Dublin – this hasn’t changed in a century.

"Guinness’ Stout dominates Dublin. […] As soon as you pull up your blinds in the morning you see a line of barges making their way down to the harbour laden with barrels of stout. […] If you cross the street without due care you are apt to be run down by Guinness’ motor lorries rushing the stout down to the place of embarking [and] the firm’s traffic all but monopolises the streets of Dublin."

The author also mentions that all Guinness ‘motor men or bargemen may be known by their 'head gear' as they all wear ‘felt hats of orthodox shape with a black band of glaced [sic] leather going right over the crown from ear to ear.’ These appear to be bowler hats like the one shown here from a later guide book, with the band clearly visible.

Our visitor also tells us that at this time the site had 9 miles of railway track and 20 locomotive engines, and other figures such as the total amount of water used by the brewery is 7 billion gallons a year!

There are more figures to come, the above-mentioned fermenting house that is the current visitor’s centre was originally constructed with 2 million bricks and 3,650 tons of steel, along with 200 thousand cubic feet of concrete. That building contained 16 fermentation vessels with a total capacity of 208 thousand gallons. The vat house nearby contained 190 vats with a total storage capacity of almost 14 million gallons or 110 million pints or porter. Those were made of English oak and hooped with of half a mile of iron strapping. On the transport side of things, the stables housed 100 horses – mostly Shires and Clydesdales – and the company operated 60 motorised lorries that could reach the heady heights of 12 miles per hour. (That comment makes a mockery of the earlier comment about being run over by a ‘rushing’ vehicle! )1,500 new casks are made weekly and up to 15,000 casks can be filled daily, with a dozen being filled at once from each racking engine. (I truth, most of these figures had been pulled by the author from a slightly early edition of the souvenir guide, as the one shown here was printed a couple of months after their visit, but the design seems to be very similar if not the same.)

And lastly of course the author got to sample the produce – the same four variations mentioned above – ‘In neat aluminium mugs the visitor gets a fair sample of each, and with his breath turned makes his way into the outer world.’ It is of interest to see that right up to the end of the tour the focus is on the process and the product, with the sample beers at the end served in plain metal mugs. There is no hint at the marketing that would follow, where the idea of ritual, aesthetics and the drinking experience – rightly or wrongly - would perhaps become more important than the actual beer itself, although obviously you need to have a product before you build hype. That might make some people a little sad about how our brewing history has been reduced to products where we once had breweries, with beers like Smithwick’s as well as Guinness, and even the less well known Macardle’s each having essentially been compressed into a brand, and it could be argued that in doing so it severed their true historic connection to a richer and more varied past for many drinkers - a connection we should try to re-establish.

Regardless of all that, there is many a beer historian and others who would love a chance to experience the beers of this earlier era. Perhaps Guinness might oblige at some stage with a new/old exhibition where visitors get a chance to taste the porters of the past, preferably out of one of those aluminium mugs …?

Liam K

(Here is the link to object #3)

Please note, all written content and the research involved in publishing it here is my own unless otherwise stated and cannot be reproduced elsewhere without permission, full credit to its sources, and a link back to this post. The images of the featured booklet are the authors own, as is the booklet itself.

Friday, 10 February 2023

100 Years of Irish Brewing in 50 Objects: #1 - D’Arcy & Son's Anchor Brewery Livery Button (c. 1900)

On the closed square piano a pudding in a huge yellow dish lay in waiting and behind it were three squads of bottles of stout and ale and minerals, drawn up according to their uniforms, the first two black, with brown and red labels, the third and smallest squad white, with transverse green sashes. 
James Joyce – The Dead

That colourful description by Joyce of bottles of beer lined neatly on top of a piano in the supper room which was situated upstairs in a tall house on Usher’s Island - a little west of the centre of Dublin city on the south side of the river Liffey - is quite a strong and evocative image, the words conjuring up the formality and neatness of soldiers in uniform on a parade ground in a time long gone. The story is set around the end of the 19th century and at that time there were a number of breweries within the general vicinity of that house, and it is very probable that these unnamed (and of course fictional) beers were the relatively local Guinness stout, plus imported Bass ale from England as both were extremely popular at that time in households in the city and their labelling would fit Joyce’s description.

And although we will be staying around the environs of Usher's Island, it is a uniform other than the military ones alluded to above that is of significance to those with an interest in the history of our country's brewing past.

-o-

When we consider those who work in breweries we tend to focus on the owners and the actual brewers of the beer, but there are a host of other departments in any successful brewing business such as marketing, administration and - very importantly - the logistics of getting the beers from the supplier to the consumer. Nowadays, transportation is often handled by cold-chain distribution in vans and trucks but in the past the delivery of beer would have been literally handled by draymen who drove their horse drawn carts laden with barrels through the cities and countryside, going either directly to the local bottlers and wholesalers, or to canal boats and trains for distribution around the whole country, or perhaps even to ships - starting a journey which might bring those barrels half way around the world.

This small button measuring 3cm (1 3⁄16 inches) in diameter is made of a copper alloy - possibly brass - and shows some green patination where the gilding has worn away to expose the base metal. It is probably from the livery uniform of one of the draymen who worked for the Anchor Brewery of John D’Arcy & Son on Usher Street, not far from where those aforementioned other-uniformed squads lined up. It features the words ‘J. D’Arcy & Son Ltd. Brewery’ and a nicely embossed anchor whose pronged ends appear to resemble demons’ tails. The button must be from between 1896 and 1926 give the date when the brewery became a limited company and when it closed, but it is probably from the earlier part of that period given other examples of the same style date from that era. The reverse is missing the eyelet and shows the name of the supplier ‘Comyns & Son, College Green, Dublin’ who were sellers of livery uniforms too, although there is no indication that they also made any actual uniforms for D’Arcy & Sons - they may have just supplied the buttons to the brewery for use by another maker - but it is certainly possible they did so.

In the book ‘Ireland: Industrial & Agricultural’ published in 1902 there is a photograph of a drayman wearing a double-breasted livery jacket, and although the buttons cannot be made out clearly, it would seem logical that they would be similar if not the same as the one shown here. The drayman is holding a beautiful, four-year old roan Clydesdale gelding called ‘Butter Scotch’ and they had jointly won the top award for the best horse and float at the Royal Dublin Society Spring Show in 1898 as well as the Guinness sponsored Challenge Cup for overall best horse and vehicle - awards which D’Arcy’s were well used to winning according to press cuttings from this era. The fine-looking gentleman’s name was Thomas Curran and they beat competition from The Mountjoy Brewery, two of Guinness’s floats, and one from Bass, Ratcliff, and Gretton Ltd. to win their awards according to RDS records.

Around 1889 Alfred Barnard visited D’Arcy’s for his series of books on the breweries of Britain and Ireland and wrote extensively about the business. As ever with his visits, Alfred goes into a lot of detail regarding his tour of the brewery and its layout but of most interest with regard to our current topic is the mention of fifty Clydesdale and ‘Irish’ horses being stabled on the site, with more being hired during the busy season. D’Arcy’s employed upwards of 300 people at this time too, some of whom would have been the draymen who worked with those horses, delivering casks of Darcy’s porter around the city. We can see some of those draymen again in this sketch from Alfred’s book and the uniforms of the dray men are visible, as are the floats - or drays - themselves.

To get a better idea of the layout of the brewery we can look at the Goad’s Fire Insurance Map from 1893, and this gives another good insight into the brewery layout in glorious detail, including the buildings with the extensive stables mentioned by Alfred. Incidentally, you can also see how the site backed on to the John’s Lane distillery of John Power & Son, indeed in places it is difficult to make out where one begins and the other ends.

This map ties in nicely with this sketch of the brewery from Stratten & Stratten's 'Dublin, Cork, and South of Ireland: A Literary, Commercial, and Social Review' from 1892. This again shows our draymen coming and going from the brewery and aids our understanding of the scale of the business.

This button is a tiny but tangible and tactile part of Ireland’s brewing history and deserves to be appreciated as such, and we can now perhaps picture in our minds a drayman at the turn of the last century donning his livery uniform before starting the hard work of delivering casks of ale around the city of Dublin. This type of button did not just adorn the livery uniforms of D’Arcy’s brewery, as they appear to be a relatively common addition to many a jacket at that time and later. The Phoenix and Guinness breweries used them too, and it is probable that all of the bigger brewing concerns in Dublin and elsewhere had similar. There is very little provenance attached to the example shown here but looking at the broken eyelet it is likely that breakages and losses were common, and no doubt there are a quite a few similar buttons to be found, perhaps in the corner of an old cellar or having fallen through a grating on the street, still waiting to be found by an appreciative soul.

-o-

Some Brewery History Notes: A Complicated Backstory ...

The foundation date of the original brewing concerns that occupied the site of D'Arcy's Anchor Brewery is unknown according to Alfred Barnard in his write-up mentioned above - although other sources such as an advertisement by the brewery in The Sport in May 1897 and a write up from which the above image of an entrance gate is taken in The Freeman's Journal in September 1913 mention a date of 1740 - which we must take with a pinch of salt. Alfred also mentions deeds in the possession of the then proprietor which date back to 1782 when the site was owned by a Kavanagh & Brett, with the brewery coming into the hands of John D’Arcy via a John Byrne in 1818, and was owned by his son Matthew D’Arcy at the time of Alfred’s visit. The brewery was expanded by Matthew with the addition of more land, buildings and equipment and by then the area taken up by the brewery and its operations was seven acres. Of note was the mention of a copper brew kettle of ‘mammoth’ proportions which was said to be the largest in the world at this time – an interesting claim if hard to prove. It held 1,300 barrels, took over a year to make and on its completion ‘thirty people partook of refreshments therein.'

We can add further to that information, as John D’Arcy was in partnership at first with a James McNulty according to Saunder’s Newsletter in October of 1819 when that partnership was dissolved. The earliest mention of a brewery on Usher Street in newspapers is for a porter brewery owned by Samuel Madder & Co. from London who were brewing there in 1785 according to Saunders's Newsletter in April of that year. In 1797 it was owned by a John Ormston who became bankrupt according to Saunder’s Newsletter from June of that same year. A newspaper advertisement in The Hibernian Journal in March of 1806 states the brewery was owned (or operated) by an Edmund Grange & Co., where they produced porter under the Hibernian Anchor Porter Brewery name, and a Leeson - a famous Dublin brewing family name - is mentioned with Grange as an owner in Saunders's News-Letter of March 1809. John Byrne may have been the next owner of the site before then selling it to John D’Arcy. To add further complications the aforementioned Kavanagh & Brett were still brewing together up to 1799 when their partnership was dissolved according to Saunders's News-Letter in October of that year, with John Brett residing in Usher's Island. This is at odds with their mention by Alfred above but they may have been brewing on a different site.

The Anchor Brewery appears to have had quite a convoluted history, not helped by the issue that there may have been multiple breweries on Usher Street and the streets surrounding it, which may muddy the ownership details. It is possible that there were breweries side-by-side that became a single entity in time. There are a number of histories available online and in books but many seem to just repeat parts of Alfred Barnard's history, although some do give a varying account - so reader beware.

-o- 

Finally, it is worth mentioning that by 1914, when Joyce’s Dubliners book of short stories that features The Dead was eventually published, Darcy’s brewed ‘O’Connell’s Dublin Ale’ as well as porter, having acquired the brand when the bought The Phoenix Brewery a few years previously. Later examples of the labels from D'Arcy's time of marketing the brand are red in colour so perhaps the original Phoenix label (from around the same period as our button) was also a shade of red? It would be fanciful to think that it was beers from the Phoenix brewery that were in Joyce’s head at the time he wrote those lines, but perhaps I am wrong about Guinness and Bass and there is a - albeit tenuous - connection between the passage quoted above and D'Arcy's brewery on Usher Street ...

Liam K



Please note, all written content and the research involved in publishing it here is my own unless otherwise stated and cannot be reproduced elsewhere without permission, full credit to its sources, and a link back to this post.

Newspaper image of D'Arcy's brewery gate © The British Library Board - All rights reserved. With thanks to The British Newspaper Archive (www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk) from whom I have received permission to display this image on this site. Button images are the authors own - as is the button itself - and the image of the D'Arcy Label is from 'The British, Foreign, and Colonial Tradesmarks' Directory' from 1866. The Goad fire insurance map of Dublin was sourced from Wikimedia Commons. Other images are from where stated.

Wednesday, 1 February 2023

Pub History: 'A Bottle of Porter on Draught'...?

In April of 1902 a curious case was heard at the Limerick Petty Sessions where a publican named Patrick Fennessy came before Mr. Hickson, a local magistrate. The publican had been summoned by a Sergeant Kennedy, who was an Inspector of Weights and Measures, for selling 'two bottles of draught porter.' The magistrate Mr. Hickson appeared a little confused as to what the legal issue was, and what was meant by 'bottles of draught porter' - his thinking presumably being that you could have bottled or draught porter but it could not be both..

A Head Constable called McAree was also in attendance and he went on to explain that publicans had previously used a draught beer measure called a 'Medium'  - which was smaller than a pint and cheaper more importantly - and as these were illegal, as they were not a verified and accepted volume, the publicans had been fined for using and selling them. But now the publicans were just using the same glasses 'and they called the porter supplied in them "bottles of porter on draught."'

Mr. Hickson was still understandably confused by this (as are we at this point) so he asked if he was to get a bottle of porter and pour it into a measure and said bottle contained more than a pint but less than a quart what would be the legality, to which the Sergeant replied that this would be a legal sale, but that in the case before the magistrate the porter was drawn from a cask into a 'medium' glass but this was just called 'a bottle of porter on draught' - presumably by the customer to differentiate it from any other porter pour or 'real' bottle. The defendant Mr. Fennessy claimed he was just giving the customer the volume he would have had from a bottle (this may indeed have been less than a pint - see my article in bottle sizes referenced below) but the magistrate naturally ruled against him - ignorance of the law being no excuse - and told him to forfeit the illegal measures and pay the costs in the case.

I have covered some of this before in articles such as the one on the Meejum (Medium) measure - and there are grey areas as far as the legalities are concerned for those selling beer, or so some claimed at least. It appears that the publican was referencing the reputed pint or another size bottle that was less than a pint (I have written on here previously about bottle sizes) so he may have genuinely thought he was doing no wrong with his medium measure of porter, and it meant he could sell that size for a certain cost to keep some of his poorer customers lubricated - little like Dublin's 'Loop-Liner' too perhaps - but as with much of this reported history we might take this whole piece with a grain of salt, as at times reports like these are not entirely accurate.

Either way it appears on paper at least that in the early 20th century Limerick drinkers were asking for 'A Bottle of Porter on Draught' in order to receive a medium measure!

We really did have odd drinking terminology in this country ...

Liam K

The Weekly Irish Times - Saturday 5th of April 1902

All written content and the research involved in publishing it here is my own unless otherwise stated and cannot be reproduced elsewhere without permission, full credit to its sources, and a link back to this post. Newspaper images © The British Library Board - All rights reserved. With thanks to The British Newspaper Archive (www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk) from whom I have received permission to display this image on this site.